New Mexico Debates Bare‑Knuckle Ban at NMAC Meeting

Commission Halts Bare‑Knuckle Rules

At Monday’s New Mexico Athletic Commission gathering, a proposed revision signaled a possible ban on bare‑knuckle fighting. The body decided to set aside discussion of the sport’s regulations, leaving the matter pending. Chairman Ed Manzanares emphasized the need for additional research and clearer data before any decision is made. The quick public backlash prompted the commission to step back and gather more information.

Supporters Cite Growth and Safety Data

Advocates for bare‑knuckle argued that the sport is no more hazardous than boxing or mixed martial arts and may even be safer. Gabriel Padilla, an Albuquerque combat‑sports reporter, pointed out that the discipline generated the largest ticket sales and economic impact among state combat sports over the past decade. According to Padilla, available data show no significant safety concerns. He noted that the sport consistently draws larger crowds than its regulated counterparts.

Fears of Unsanctioned Events Rise

Referees warned that a ban could push events underground, where safety standards would be absent. Sid Ware, a referee in the state, said the sanctioned version has benefited the community, the local economy, and participants. He cautioned that without official oversight, fighters could be exposed to greater risk. Ware’s prediction that unsanctioned cards would appear if the sport were prohibited carries weight among industry insiders.

Medical and Training Concerns Highlighted

Chris Tellez urged the commission to review a study prepared by Dr. Don Muzzi, a Florida neurologist who serves as chief medical officer for the Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship. Tellez explained that a bare‑fist strike to the head typically delivers less force than a knee or elbow allowed in MMA. He believed the research would help the panel understand the comparative risks. The study, he added, is a key resource for informed policymaking.

Joe Coca, a referee with experience across multiple states, lambasted the NMAC for its lack of mandatory training for officials. He noted that the commission is the only sanctioning body he has encountered that does not require training for referees and judges. Coca argued that insufficient preparation, rather than the sport itself, creates dangerous conditions. Meanwhile, David Rios praised the BKFC’s safety protocols, highlighting the presence of five doctors at events. Rios said that even minor cuts trigger immediate stoppages and medical attention, underscoring a robust approach to fighter welfare.

Fee Hikes Spark Fighter Alarm

Both Allen Dominguez and Jon Judy voiced concerns over a proposed increase in annual fees for combat‑sports participants, officials, and support staff. The cost would rise from $25 to $75, a change that could strain fighters already navigating tight budgets. Dominguez and Judy warned that many athletes simply cannot afford the higher license fee. Their plea focused on protecting the financial viability of competitors in the state.

A Voice of Dissent

Among the three comments posted on the NMAC website, only one opposed the sport outright. Albuquerque resident Don Shrader wrote that he condemns all violent sports, listing bare‑knuckle fighting, boxing, MMA, and football among them. His handwritten note added a stark, uncompromising perspective to the debate. Shrader’s stance highlights the broader ethical questions surrounding combat events.

Looking Ahead

The NMAC’s decision to postpone action leaves the future of bare‑knuckle fighting in New Mexico uncertain. Stakeholders on both sides will likely continue to gather data and build arguments in the coming months. Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s office has signaled that safety remains a top priority, though no public comment has been issued yet. Observers will watch whether additional research and stakeholder input lead to a ban, a revised regulation, or a continued status quo.